

Child Behaviour, Early Years, Parent Wellbeing
Child Behaviour, Early Years, Parent Wellbeing
I am not Anti Gentle Parenting, I'm confused.
I am not Anti Gentle Parenting, I'm confused.
Everyone has a strong opinion on gentle parenting right now, and most of them are arguing about a version of it that was never real to begin with.
Everyone has a strong opinion on gentle parenting right now, and most of them are arguing about a version of it that was never real to begin with.
Sound Familiar
Sound Familiar
You came to gentle parenting because you did not want to repeat what was done to you. Somewhere between the research and the Instagram reel, you got the message that saying no was unkind and that boundaries were somehow the opposite of gentle. Now you are negotiating with a toddler about pasta shapes at 7pm and you cannot quite remember how you got here.
You came to gentle parenting because you did not want to repeat what was done to you. Somewhere between the research and the Instagram reel, you got the message that saying no was unkind and that boundaries were somehow the opposite of gentle. Now you are negotiating with a toddler about pasta shapes at 7pm and you cannot quite remember how you got here.
You came to gentle parenting because you did not want to repeat what was done to you. Somewhere between the research and the Instagram reel, you got the message that saying no was unkind and that boundaries were somehow the opposite of gentle. Now you are negotiating with a toddler about pasta shapes at 7pm and you cannot quite remember how you got here.
Josh Ezekiel
Josh Ezekiel
The Journey
The Journey
A mum is on the kitchen floor at 6 pm, her toddler is in the middle of a meltdown over the wrong-coloured cup, and she is doing everything right. So why isn't it working?
What is gentle parenting, before we go any further?
Gentle parenting, as it was originally conceived, is not about never saying no. It is not about avoiding conflict or processing every emotion in real time while dinner burns on the hob. It is about treating children with dignity. Understanding that behaviour is always communication. Responding rather than reacting. That is it, that is the whole thing. The problem was never the philosophy. The problem is what happened to it between the peer reviewed research and the forty second video with the trending sound. Somewhere in that translation, the limits got quietly removed, and nobody told parents that limits were never meant to be optional.
Why do children actually need you to hold the line?
Here is something the gentle parenting content does not talk about enough. Structure is not the opposite of safety. It is safety. When a young child tests a boundary, and they will because that is genuinely their job, they are asking a question. Is this world predictable? Can I trust you to keep me safe even when I push? A parent who holds the limit calmly and warmly is answering that question. A parent who gives way every time is leaving it unanswered, and an unanswered question in a young child's nervous system does not feel like freedom. It feels like anxiety. Children do not want to be in charge. They are just very, very convincing when they act like they do.
Can you really be warm and firm at the same time?
Developmental psychologist Diana Baumrind spent decades studying what actually produced good outcomes in children. The style that came out on top consistently was not the most permissive, and it was not the most authoritarian. It was what she called authoritative parenting. High warmth, clear expectations, consistent follow through. The word that matters in that list is and. Not warmth instead of structure. Not kindness as a replacement for limits. Both, together, at the same time. You can get down to your child's level, name what they're feeling, tell them you understand they are disappointed, and still say no. These things were never in conflict. They just got separated on the way to your feed.
Why is this debate louder right now than ever before?
The UK is having a very public argument about this. Earlier this year, behaviour expert Tom Bennett told the Sunday Times that parents are scared to discipline their children, and that it is showing up in classrooms. Sarah Ockwell Smith, the British author who coined the term gentle parenting, pushed back and pointed out that gentle parenting has always included discipline and boundaries. Both of them are, in different ways, right. The method is not the problem. The misinterpretation is. And the reason the misinterpretation spread so far is because empathy is a much easier thing to put in a sixty second video than the harder, quieter truth: being genuinely warm with your child sometimes means disappointing them, consistently, on purpose, because that is what they actually need.
What is gentle parenting, before we go any further?
Gentle parenting, as it was originally conceived, is not about never saying no. It is not about avoiding conflict or processing every emotion in real time while dinner burns on the hob. It is about treating children with dignity. Understanding that behaviour is always communication. Responding rather than reacting. That is it, that is the whole thing. The problem was never the philosophy. The problem is what happened to it between the peer reviewed research and the forty second video with the trending sound. Somewhere in that translation, the limits got quietly removed, and nobody told parents that limits were never meant to be optional.
Why do children actually need you to hold the line?
Here is something the gentle parenting content does not talk about enough. Structure is not the opposite of safety. It is safety. When a young child tests a boundary, and they will because that is genuinely their job, they are asking a question. Is this world predictable? Can I trust you to keep me safe even when I push? A parent who holds the limit calmly and warmly is answering that question. A parent who gives way every time is leaving it unanswered, and an unanswered question in a young child's nervous system does not feel like freedom. It feels like anxiety. Children do not want to be in charge. They are just very, very convincing when they act like they do.
Can you really be warm and firm at the same time?
Developmental psychologist Diana Baumrind spent decades studying what actually produced good outcomes in children. The style that came out on top consistently was not the most permissive, and it was not the most authoritarian. It was what she called authoritative parenting. High warmth, clear expectations, consistent follow through. The word that matters in that list is and. Not warmth instead of structure. Not kindness as a replacement for limits. Both, together, at the same time. You can get down to your child's level, name what they're feeling, tell them you understand they are disappointed, and still say no. These things were never in conflict. They just got separated on the way to your feed.
Why is this debate louder right now than ever before?
The UK is having a very public argument about this. Earlier this year, behaviour expert Tom Bennett told the Sunday Times that parents are scared to discipline their children, and that it is showing up in classrooms. Sarah Ockwell Smith, the British author who coined the term gentle parenting, pushed back and pointed out that gentle parenting has always included discipline and boundaries. Both of them are, in different ways, right. The method is not the problem. The misinterpretation is. And the reason the misinterpretation spread so far is because empathy is a much easier thing to put in a sixty second video than the harder, quieter truth: being genuinely warm with your child sometimes means disappointing them, consistently, on purpose, because that is what they actually need.
"Warmth without structure is not gentle parenting. It is just exhausting, for everyone, including the child."
"Warmth without structure is not gentle parenting. It is just exhausting, for everyone, including the child."
Josh Ezekiel
Josh Ezekiel
"Warmth without structure is not gentle parenting. It is just exhausting, for everyone, including the child."
Josh Ezekiel
So what does this look like on an actual Tuesday morning?
Let's get concrete, because this is where it matters. Your four year old does not want to put their shoes on. You are already late. The internet version of gentle parenting: crouch down, empathise, ask open questions, wait patiently for them to arrive at the answer themselves. You arrive at nursery at noon. Gentle parenting with the limits intact: crouch down, empathise, "I know, you want to keep playing, that makes sense," and then put the shoes on anyway. Not as punishment, not with a raised voice, just calmly and warmly and without negotiating. The child cries. You hold the line. The world does not end. Something quieter happens instead. The child learns that you are in charge of the situation, which means they do not have to be, and that is an enormous relief to a small person.
What does psychoanalysis say about all of this?
Donald Winnicott, the paediatrician and psychoanalyst who gave us the idea of the good enough parent, is often quoted as permission to stop trying so hard. But that is only half the idea. Winnicott also wrote about something he called optimal frustration, the small, manageable disappointments that happen when the world does not bend entirely to a child's will. These moments are not failures of parenting. They are the actual mechanism by which a child builds a self. The capacity to wait, to tolerate a no, to sit with a feeling that does not immediately go away, these are not things you can explain to a child. They are things a child builds through experience, one small frustration at a time. You are not failing your child when you hold a boundary. You are doing something quite precise, and quite important.
What do you do when you genuinely do not know where the line is?
If you are reading this and feeling a bit wobbly about where warmth ends and structure begins, that is a normal feeling and it means you are paying attention. There is not a formula. It depends on the child, the situation, the age, what kind of day everyone is having. What I would offer instead is a question to hold: Is this limit here because it is good for my child, or because it is convenient for me? Both are valid, by the way. You are a person, not a therapeutic service. A limit that exists because you are exhausted and need five minutes is a legitimate limit. You do not need to justify every no with developmental theory. The point is that the limit exists, and that you hold it.
You never had to choose between kind and firm. That was never the choice.
The gentle parenting debate has set up a false binary, and a lot of parents are stuck in the middle of it, feeling like they are failing at both. You are not. The parents who are getting it closest are not the ones who never raise their voice and process every emotion beautifully. They are the ones who repair when it goes wrong. Who say sorry when they shout. Who hold the limit and still give the hug. Who are warm enough that the child knows they are loved, and firm enough that the child knows where the edges are. That combination is what a child's nervous system is actually looking for. You already know this. You probably just needed someone to say it plainly.
If you are finding the balance harder than it sounds in a blog post, I am here. Head over to the Lets Talk page to figure it out together
Josh Ezekiel is an Early Years professional and trainee Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist with over 10 years working with children and families.
So what does this look like on an actual Tuesday morning?
Let's get concrete, because this is where it matters. Your four year old does not want to put their shoes on. You are already late. The internet version of gentle parenting: crouch down, empathise, ask open questions, wait patiently for them to arrive at the answer themselves. You arrive at nursery at noon. Gentle parenting with the limits intact: crouch down, empathise, "I know, you want to keep playing, that makes sense," and then put the shoes on anyway. Not as punishment, not with a raised voice, just calmly and warmly and without negotiating. The child cries. You hold the line. The world does not end. Something quieter happens instead. The child learns that you are in charge of the situation, which means they do not have to be, and that is an enormous relief to a small person.
What does psychoanalysis say about all of this?
Donald Winnicott, the paediatrician and psychoanalyst who gave us the idea of the good enough parent, is often quoted as permission to stop trying so hard. But that is only half the idea. Winnicott also wrote about something he called optimal frustration, the small, manageable disappointments that happen when the world does not bend entirely to a child's will. These moments are not failures of parenting. They are the actual mechanism by which a child builds a self. The capacity to wait, to tolerate a no, to sit with a feeling that does not immediately go away, these are not things you can explain to a child. They are things a child builds through experience, one small frustration at a time. You are not failing your child when you hold a boundary. You are doing something quite precise, and quite important.
What do you do when you genuinely do not know where the line is?
If you are reading this and feeling a bit wobbly about where warmth ends and structure begins, that is a normal feeling and it means you are paying attention. There is not a formula. It depends on the child, the situation, the age, what kind of day everyone is having. What I would offer instead is a question to hold: Is this limit here because it is good for my child, or because it is convenient for me? Both are valid, by the way. You are a person, not a therapeutic service. A limit that exists because you are exhausted and need five minutes is a legitimate limit. You do not need to justify every no with developmental theory. The point is that the limit exists, and that you hold it.
You never had to choose between kind and firm. That was never the choice.
The gentle parenting debate has set up a false binary, and a lot of parents are stuck in the middle of it, feeling like they are failing at both. You are not. The parents who are getting it closest are not the ones who never raise their voice and process every emotion beautifully. They are the ones who repair when it goes wrong. Who say sorry when they shout. Who hold the limit and still give the hug. Who are warm enough that the child knows they are loved, and firm enough that the child knows where the edges are. That combination is what a child's nervous system is actually looking for. You already know this. You probably just needed someone to say it plainly.
If you are finding the balance harder than it sounds in a blog post, I am here. Head over to the Lets Talk page to figure it out together
Josh Ezekiel is an Early Years professional and trainee Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist with over 10 years working with children and families.
Ready to find your path?
Ready to find your path?
If this story resonates with you, maybe it’s time to start your own journey
If this story resonates with you, maybe it’s time to start your own journey
Prefer to chat first? Send me an email or connect with us on social, I'm always happy to help.
Prefer to chat first? Send me an email or connect with us on social, I'm always happy to help.